raysaikat
07-25 02:13 AM
Can't he use EB-3 LC for filing his EB-2 case as well?
wallpaper jungle book coloring pages
Blog Feeds
04-27 08:50 AM
The Sojourners are condemning the new law and promising civil disobedience. Here is their leader Reverend Jim Wallace's statement: The law signed today by Arizona Gov. Brewer is a social and racial sin, and should be denounced as such by people of faith and conscience across the nation. It is not just about Arizona, but about all of us, and about what kind of country we want to be. It is not only mean-spirited - it will be ineffective and will only serve to further divide communities in Arizona, making everyone more fearful and less safe. This radical new measure,...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/christian-organization-vows-to-defy-arizona-law.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/christian-organization-vows-to-defy-arizona-law.html)
number8
04-14 04:10 PM
Hi Experts,
My 140 was recently transferred from Nebraska to Texas after waiting 13 months. RD is March 2007. My company's lawyer contacted USCIS to open an SR as Texas is processing July/Aug 2007 applications and past my processing dates. USCIS refused to open an SR and advised that my application will be treated a new one and will be processed after the other application received in April 2008.
I think USCIS should honor the original RD when a case is transferred from one service center to the other.
I am shocked. I have already waited for 13 months and don't feel this is fair.
I am not sure what are my options are now? I am thinking to contact Ombudsman and local congress man.
Please advice.
My 140 was recently transferred from Nebraska to Texas after waiting 13 months. RD is March 2007. My company's lawyer contacted USCIS to open an SR as Texas is processing July/Aug 2007 applications and past my processing dates. USCIS refused to open an SR and advised that my application will be treated a new one and will be processed after the other application received in April 2008.
I think USCIS should honor the original RD when a case is transferred from one service center to the other.
I am shocked. I have already waited for 13 months and don't feel this is fair.
I am not sure what are my options are now? I am thinking to contact Ombudsman and local congress man.
Please advice.
2011 The Kids Colouring Book
djmaddy
07-30 03:59 AM
this one is very cool
Thanks a lot Dom, it took some time for me to find transparent layered maps of water to work with. Initially this was drawn with the orange falling down, but an even splash wasn't what i had in mind. So I had random splash, mostly one directional and then spinned the image to have gravity work as well-once again thanks
Thanks a lot Dom, it took some time for me to find transparent layered maps of water to work with. Initially this was drawn with the orange falling down, but an even splash wasn't what i had in mind. So I had random splash, mostly one directional and then spinned the image to have gravity work as well-once again thanks
more...
BECsufferer
10-07 06:59 AM
I guess I wasn't shocked when I saw this story, but I have to say it depressed me. The AP reports that Derby Line, Vermont and Stanstead, Quebec, really one town that happens to straddle a border, is now installing security gates to physically separate the community.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/10/immigration-fears-dividing-a-town-literally.html)
Nothing wrong with gates and fences. It's security measure, ... I am all for it and fine. Unlike Quebec, atleast in my America, outsiders are not frowned upon. Nor denied help just becaue you cannot speak their language (French). Take away from my last trip to Quebec (Quebec City) is, they don't like to see us in their part of world, nor do we welcome them.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/10/immigration-fears-dividing-a-town-literally.html)
Nothing wrong with gates and fences. It's security measure, ... I am all for it and fine. Unlike Quebec, atleast in my America, outsiders are not frowned upon. Nor denied help just becaue you cannot speak their language (French). Take away from my last trip to Quebec (Quebec City) is, they don't like to see us in their part of world, nor do we welcome them.
vinnysuru
03-18 03:32 PM
Hello,
Assuming a 40 hr/week position, a person works 2080 hours per year. The Annual Salary for a $46/hr position is $95680/year.
Also, if you only have annual salary for the new position, you could convert to hourly by dividing by 2080.
But I wouldn't even worry about all this. Just send in the annual salary figure (just for your own satisfaction make sure it is more than $46 per hour) and USCIS will figure out the rest.
Hope that helps.
Assuming a 40 hr/week position, a person works 2080 hours per year. The Annual Salary for a $46/hr position is $95680/year.
Also, if you only have annual salary for the new position, you could convert to hourly by dividing by 2080.
But I wouldn't even worry about all this. Just send in the annual salary figure (just for your own satisfaction make sure it is more than $46 per hour) and USCIS will figure out the rest.
Hope that helps.
more...
GoneSouth
07-27 11:02 AM
LAMP - Calgary. Also, some financial analysts are predicting that the $CDN will actually be worth *more* than the $US by the end of 2007.
2010 jungle book and everything
kdd
08-13 01:06 PM
Thanks guys. Yes, I saw references, and that's how I was able to figure out that it had to include a few "things" to make it work properly, such as system.dll.
:)
:)
more...
kumar1
03-06 08:14 PM
I wouldn't worry about it. Enjoy your green card.
hair jungle scene coloring pages
sanju_dba
03-10 01:55 PM
It is really funny. I guess no amount of me explaining about soft LUD would help. People will still track them and waste their time.
You can always add corrections, You are the Admin!
You can always add corrections, You are the Admin!
more...
b3mus3d
11-11 08:11 AM
Oh that's flipping typical, I think my hosting went down.
Right, I'll just set up a photobucket account for the moment...
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c239/b3mus3d/stamp5.png
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c239/b3mus3d/stamp4.png
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c239/b3mus3d/stamp3.png
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c239/b3mus3d/stamp6.png
There, that's not all of them but my hosting should be back soonish.
Right, I'll just set up a photobucket account for the moment...
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c239/b3mus3d/stamp5.png
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c239/b3mus3d/stamp4.png
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c239/b3mus3d/stamp3.png
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c239/b3mus3d/stamp6.png
There, that's not all of them but my hosting should be back soonish.
hot jungle book 2 coloring
AmericanDreamZ
10-19 01:36 PM
H1, H4 (spouse) and H4 (kid) living happily.
File 485 and gets EAD/AP.
H1 doesn't use EAD.
H4 uses EAD and hence looses H4 status.
I-485 is denied.
Now, my understanding is that spouse has to go out of country and come back again on H4.
What about the kid?
When does the kid loose his/her H4 status? (When both mother and father use EAD)?
This is just my thought, I would believe when the father (or whoever was on H1) uses EAD, the subsequent H4's would get canceled and their status would be Pending AOS. If 485 is denied, and if H1 person has not used EAD, then both son and mother can re enter on H4.
-Suraj
File 485 and gets EAD/AP.
H1 doesn't use EAD.
H4 uses EAD and hence looses H4 status.
I-485 is denied.
Now, my understanding is that spouse has to go out of country and come back again on H4.
What about the kid?
When does the kid loose his/her H4 status? (When both mother and father use EAD)?
This is just my thought, I would believe when the father (or whoever was on H1) uses EAD, the subsequent H4's would get canceled and their status would be Pending AOS. If 485 is denied, and if H1 person has not used EAD, then both son and mother can re enter on H4.
-Suraj
more...
house jungle book jungle book 2 kim
morrisking
03-09 07:48 PM
Thanks for the reply.
Ok, here is the situation. I am the guy in this venture with all the business contacts and would have to involve in some email conversations with the clients and also visit them on an occasional basis.
I am willing to do this without pay and also appoint someone as CEO instead of me. Can I be the Chairman of the Board, and do this kind of work.
Ok, here is the situation. I am the guy in this venture with all the business contacts and would have to involve in some email conversations with the clients and also visit them on an occasional basis.
I am willing to do this without pay and also appoint someone as CEO instead of me. Can I be the Chairman of the Board, and do this kind of work.
tattoo Jungle Book coloring pages.
ttguy
08-11 02:40 AM
You dont have to mention **it. Just saying diaper is enough, everyone knows whats in diaper.
more...
pictures jungle book coloring pages
bigboy007
08-24 10:45 PM
This is a contract position to work in canada.This is normally through couple of vendors.
My employer is a small consulting company,which don't have own projects.So they pay only when I get project with other consultancies companies and bill through them.
You get work visa in canada then you need to be paid in canada..Work visa in canada has nothing to do with that of US status.
If you are getting paid in usa ( it seems like) and planning on working in canada on visitor visa its not legal. This might be the reason.
Your status in US has nothing to do with Working/Visiting/studying in Canada.
If you have used AP you "Probably" not on H1 any more.. there are some contradicting statements of IV members on this before. But I have seen USCIS sending a notice for one of my friend where in which he was advised to use AP ( as he is considered being on AOS eventhough he has H1) in future.
My employer is a small consulting company,which don't have own projects.So they pay only when I get project with other consultancies companies and bill through them.
You get work visa in canada then you need to be paid in canada..Work visa in canada has nothing to do with that of US status.
If you are getting paid in usa ( it seems like) and planning on working in canada on visitor visa its not legal. This might be the reason.
Your status in US has nothing to do with Working/Visiting/studying in Canada.
If you have used AP you "Probably" not on H1 any more.. there are some contradicting statements of IV members on this before. But I have seen USCIS sending a notice for one of my friend where in which he was advised to use AP ( as he is considered being on AOS eventhough he has H1) in future.
dresses and coloring book sheets.
pappu
01-01 06:31 PM
IV has been featured in India Post newspaper.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=40338#post40338
Could someone send me the scanned copy of the article? I would post it on the site for everyone to see and also record it for our purposes.
himanshu at immigrationvoice.org
thanks
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=40338#post40338
Could someone send me the scanned copy of the article? I would post it on the site for everyone to see and also record it for our purposes.
himanshu at immigrationvoice.org
thanks
more...
makeup pages for the jungle book
ChainReaction
03-06 01:58 PM
March 6, 2006
Dear XXXXX:
Thank you for contacting me in support of recapturing unused
employment-based immigrant visas and imposing fees for
immigration services for intracompany transferees. I apologize for
the delay in my reply, but I appreciate hearing from you and I
welcome the opportunity to respond.
I agree that the U.S. government should recapture unused
employment-based immigrant visas and impose immigration service
fees for those visas. As you may know, the United States Senate
version of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, S. 1932, included a
provision that would recapture up to 30,000 H-1B visas that had not
been issued in prior years. Also, S. 1932 would impose an additional
$500 fee to obtain these recaptured visas. These provisions were not
included in the House-passed version of the Deficit Reduction Act of
2005, H.R. 4241. Unfortunately, the Conference Committee, which
was responsible for resolving the differences between the House and
Senate versions of the bill, did not include this provision in the
final
version of S. 1932. The final version of S. 1932 passed in the House
by a vote of 216-214 on February 1, 2006. President Bush signed this
bill into law on February 8, 2006.
Please be assured that I will keep our shared support for
recapturing unused employment-based visas and imposing fees for
immigration services for these visas very much in mind as Congress
considers immigration issues.
Thank you again for contacting me. As your Representative in
the United States Congress, it is a privilege and an honor to serve you
and to act as your voice in Washington. Please feel free to contact me
again with any other issue or matter that concerns you. You may also
want to visit my website at www.house.gov/rothman where you can
sign up for my e-newsletter and keep current with my latest
Congressional activities and policy statements.
Sincerely,
Steven R. Rothman
Member of Congress
Another hopefull congressman to keep in touch with.:)
Dear XXXXX:
Thank you for contacting me in support of recapturing unused
employment-based immigrant visas and imposing fees for
immigration services for intracompany transferees. I apologize for
the delay in my reply, but I appreciate hearing from you and I
welcome the opportunity to respond.
I agree that the U.S. government should recapture unused
employment-based immigrant visas and impose immigration service
fees for those visas. As you may know, the United States Senate
version of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, S. 1932, included a
provision that would recapture up to 30,000 H-1B visas that had not
been issued in prior years. Also, S. 1932 would impose an additional
$500 fee to obtain these recaptured visas. These provisions were not
included in the House-passed version of the Deficit Reduction Act of
2005, H.R. 4241. Unfortunately, the Conference Committee, which
was responsible for resolving the differences between the House and
Senate versions of the bill, did not include this provision in the
final
version of S. 1932. The final version of S. 1932 passed in the House
by a vote of 216-214 on February 1, 2006. President Bush signed this
bill into law on February 8, 2006.
Please be assured that I will keep our shared support for
recapturing unused employment-based visas and imposing fees for
immigration services for these visas very much in mind as Congress
considers immigration issues.
Thank you again for contacting me. As your Representative in
the United States Congress, it is a privilege and an honor to serve you
and to act as your voice in Washington. Please feel free to contact me
again with any other issue or matter that concerns you. You may also
want to visit my website at www.house.gov/rothman where you can
sign up for my e-newsletter and keep current with my latest
Congressional activities and policy statements.
Sincerely,
Steven R. Rothman
Member of Congress
Another hopefull congressman to keep in touch with.:)
girlfriend Coloring Pages of Borneo
micbil
03-29 12:16 PM
Hello,
I am an F1 visa student and am marrying my sweetheart who is an American citizen. We are planning to pick up the marriage license tomorrow, in MA. I know one of the questions is "residence". Do I put my local residence (I've been here for about 6 years) or my foreign residence? I do not want to jeopardize my status.
Thanks
I am an F1 visa student and am marrying my sweetheart who is an American citizen. We are planning to pick up the marriage license tomorrow, in MA. I know one of the questions is "residence". Do I put my local residence (I've been here for about 6 years) or my foreign residence? I do not want to jeopardize my status.
Thanks
hairstyles Color this Page Online! free
sanam9696
03-09 05:42 PM
Need your help..
Post MBA (since Jun'06), I am working with a new employer. My previous employer (bachelor degree), filed for my labor in Nov'04 and I left this company in Jun'06; howevr employer didn't withdrew my labor application. My labor with previous employer was approved in Feb'07. I have good relation with my previous employer and they are ready to file my I-140; I have few questions regarding this:
Can my previous employer file I-140, even if I am not working with them?
If I-140 is approved, would I able to transfer the PD to my new employer, when he initiates my labor application.
Once I transfer my PD, can my previous employer use this approved LC for other candidate?
Based on my new qualifications (MBA), my job description has changed totally compared to my previous job.
Thanks in advance..
Post MBA (since Jun'06), I am working with a new employer. My previous employer (bachelor degree), filed for my labor in Nov'04 and I left this company in Jun'06; howevr employer didn't withdrew my labor application. My labor with previous employer was approved in Feb'07. I have good relation with my previous employer and they are ready to file my I-140; I have few questions regarding this:
Can my previous employer file I-140, even if I am not working with them?
If I-140 is approved, would I able to transfer the PD to my new employer, when he initiates my labor application.
Once I transfer my PD, can my previous employer use this approved LC for other candidate?
Based on my new qualifications (MBA), my job description has changed totally compared to my previous job.
Thanks in advance..
GCplease
02-04 04:41 PM
I have mis-placed my EAD. Normally I can just apply for another EAD. But, I will be travelling to India in Mid March on Advance Parole and I'm not sure if I'll get the EAD by then.
My question is, will they ask for EAD upon re-entry.
I am thinking of applying for EAD after coming back. Is there any special processing for applying for a lost EAD ?
Any advice is appreciated.
My question is, will they ask for EAD upon re-entry.
I am thinking of applying for EAD after coming back. Is there any special processing for applying for a lost EAD ?
Any advice is appreciated.
va007
05-05 07:57 PM
Thanks