mayitbesoon
01-23 04:13 PM
I want to add 'Family and Relatives pressure' in addition to 'Peer Pressure'. When I visited India lasttime, I was asked by almost all the relatives if We had bought a house. It has become an indication if we are doing well (earning well). After a while, i felt little bit uneasy to say that we did not buy house while many of our cousins already did. thats family pressure.
Other than for monetary reasons, there is a small group of people, who do not buy house even if they can afford to and live in apartments
- still not decided where to settle down,
- want to move to warm place, but just not yet due to job,
- think it is lonely to live in a big house with unfamiliar neighbors.
- have small kids, takes lot of time to meet their needs after work, daycare. cannot take the burden of maintaining a big house.
[QUOTE=nixstor;312477]
Peer pressure
Lets take fictitious families R & S living in the same rented community with similar back ground. Mr and Mrs R decide to buy a home and they buy one. Mr S does not think it is right for them to do so. How ever, Mrs S pressures Mr S into doing so. Believe me this happens all the time.
Other than for monetary reasons, there is a small group of people, who do not buy house even if they can afford to and live in apartments
- still not decided where to settle down,
- want to move to warm place, but just not yet due to job,
- think it is lonely to live in a big house with unfamiliar neighbors.
- have small kids, takes lot of time to meet their needs after work, daycare. cannot take the burden of maintaining a big house.
[QUOTE=nixstor;312477]
Peer pressure
Lets take fictitious families R & S living in the same rented community with similar back ground. Mr and Mrs R decide to buy a home and they buy one. Mr S does not think it is right for them to do so. How ever, Mrs S pressures Mr S into doing so. Believe me this happens all the time.
wallpaper Directed by: Tyler Perry
learning01
02-01 08:52 PM
Correct Link (http://thomas.loc.gov/bss/110search.html)
Sorry, there is no www.senate.gov web page matching your request
Sorry, there is no www.senate.gov web page matching your request
nk2
04-19 09:19 PM
I have spoken about IV to several friends, colleagues, acquaintances and relatives who are stuck in retrogression or likely to be affected by it sooner or later. I have found it very hard to orally convey effectively what IV does and how it benefits people like them. Of those to I have spoken to only 4 or 5 have become members of IV. Also, I think a lot of people, including me, find it difficult (shy, I guess) to directly approach people and canvass about anything.
I have also sent emails to these and several others about IV. Not sure how many read it and how many have become members. Nowadays chain and mass emails have become so ubiquitous, most people ignore or delete them, no matter who sends them.
Someone might have already done this or proposed this already, not sure
Here is what I will be doing to increase awareness about IV:
I think direct mail, although costs money, is one of the most effective way of communicating ideas and organizations like IV. People take this more seriously than emails.
In the next few days I will make a list of people (at least 30) that I want to convey about IV to and send them direct mail about IV. This will be done by printing the brochures and text of email IV has published and send it to them via postal mail. I may not have the postal addresses of all of them, but I should be able to find out by doing a reverse lookup on their phone numbers. I am also thinking of sending it to their work address if I can not find their home address.
In a few days, I will post again letting you all know how many direct mails I sent.
Here is what IV can do:
If IV thinks this is an effective way to increase membership they can do the following: Have members send them postal addresses and money towards postage and stationery. E.g. 50 cents per address. IV can send postal mails to the people (addresses given by members).
I think this is better than members sending themselves because IV can fine-tune the message and messages have more gravity if it comes from a non-profit instead of an individual person. (Others may disagree with this statement). Some may want to canvass about IV but may want to remain anonymous. Those who do not want to remain anonymous should have the option of adding their name/address at some appropriate place in the letter.
Another suggestion is that IV should publish a comprehensive direct mail package (and guidelines) that can be downloaded and printed by members like me who want to send direct mails
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signed up for recurring contribution since March 2007
Total Non-recurring contribution: $145
..
Also post your innovative ideas you have used to get members.
I have also sent emails to these and several others about IV. Not sure how many read it and how many have become members. Nowadays chain and mass emails have become so ubiquitous, most people ignore or delete them, no matter who sends them.
Someone might have already done this or proposed this already, not sure
Here is what I will be doing to increase awareness about IV:
I think direct mail, although costs money, is one of the most effective way of communicating ideas and organizations like IV. People take this more seriously than emails.
In the next few days I will make a list of people (at least 30) that I want to convey about IV to and send them direct mail about IV. This will be done by printing the brochures and text of email IV has published and send it to them via postal mail. I may not have the postal addresses of all of them, but I should be able to find out by doing a reverse lookup on their phone numbers. I am also thinking of sending it to their work address if I can not find their home address.
In a few days, I will post again letting you all know how many direct mails I sent.
Here is what IV can do:
If IV thinks this is an effective way to increase membership they can do the following: Have members send them postal addresses and money towards postage and stationery. E.g. 50 cents per address. IV can send postal mails to the people (addresses given by members).
I think this is better than members sending themselves because IV can fine-tune the message and messages have more gravity if it comes from a non-profit instead of an individual person. (Others may disagree with this statement). Some may want to canvass about IV but may want to remain anonymous. Those who do not want to remain anonymous should have the option of adding their name/address at some appropriate place in the letter.
Another suggestion is that IV should publish a comprehensive direct mail package (and guidelines) that can be downloaded and printed by members like me who want to send direct mails
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signed up for recurring contribution since March 2007
Total Non-recurring contribution: $145
..
Also post your innovative ideas you have used to get members.
2011 Tyler Perry#39;s #39;I Can Do Bad
newuser
05-15 02:27 PM
Called all of the them. Its looks like they are getting many calls from IV'ians. Good to know that.
Also called my local congressman to seek the support
Go IV
Also called my local congressman to seek the support
Go IV
more...
santb1975
04-16 09:30 PM
Kudo's to your commitment. I can never run at 5 AM
What a contrast! You guys on the west coast are running in 100 degrees. My schedule forces me to run at 5.00 am...........in 3 layers of clothing @ 40 degrees.
What a contrast! You guys on the west coast are running in 100 degrees. My schedule forces me to run at 5.00 am...........in 3 layers of clothing @ 40 degrees.
aachoo
09-01 07:51 PM
Just got the email! Havent seen my wife's application status change.
15 years+ from the day I entered the US...
15 years+ from the day I entered the US...
more...
abracadabra
07-11 07:33 PM
I guess the letter is authentic afterall -
http://lofgren.house.gov/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=1810
�The Department�s unprecedented decision to reject adjustment of status applications has caused needless hardship and disruption to countless immigrants,� noted Rep. Zoe Lofgren. �It has also come to my attention that USCIS began returning visa numbers to the State Department as early as Thursday, July 5, 2007, due to their inability to review applications effectively. The Department of Homeland Security has once again demonstrated its inability to complete even its core missions. This debacle demonstrates the need for more transparency and oversight of the department�s operations and procedures.�
http://lofgren.house.gov/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=1810
�The Department�s unprecedented decision to reject adjustment of status applications has caused needless hardship and disruption to countless immigrants,� noted Rep. Zoe Lofgren. �It has also come to my attention that USCIS began returning visa numbers to the State Department as early as Thursday, July 5, 2007, due to their inability to review applications effectively. The Department of Homeland Security has once again demonstrated its inability to complete even its core missions. This debacle demonstrates the need for more transparency and oversight of the department�s operations and procedures.�
2010 Movies, All Fridays, Tyler
jonty_11
06-14 03:04 PM
GC is moving target, looks like some drunkard wakes up one fine morning and randomly moves the priority date value/importance. I know those in such situation may be relatively less in number but I know many who are and repurcussions for this look horrible for people who have not made past this luck test. I was one of the unlucky ones :(. good luck to guys who have moved forward hope you still help rest of us still stuck.
given waht everyone has gone thru over these years..and continues to endure... I will continue to support IV and its goals.
given waht everyone has gone thru over these years..and continues to endure... I will continue to support IV and its goals.
more...
amitjoey
01-18 08:22 PM
Are we just a bunch of stingy people wanting everything for free!!????
Highskilled people for free stuff? The answer should be NO!
OUT OF THE 300,000 people stuck due to retrogression, only 8500 OR SO are IV members. Out of which not even a 1000 want to commit for minimum of $20/ month. Right now we only have some 120 people committed. That is really a shame!!. Then we find a few (5 or less people) asking what is IV doing with the funds?. What funds?
Highskilled people for free stuff? The answer should be NO!
OUT OF THE 300,000 people stuck due to retrogression, only 8500 OR SO are IV members. Out of which not even a 1000 want to commit for minimum of $20/ month. Right now we only have some 120 people committed. That is really a shame!!. Then we find a few (5 or less people) asking what is IV doing with the funds?. What funds?
hair any Tyler Perry movie,
rnanchal
01-19 04:47 PM
How is IV keeping a track of those that are contributing something. I signed up for recurring contributions a few days ago, but did not disclose it on this forum. I am sure there are a few like me who want to contribute albeit discreetly.
Thanks
Thanks
more...
PlainSpeak
01-13 03:05 PM
1) I have read some of your earlier posts on this thread and what you have primarily done is merely re-iterated what the issue is. Without any contribution or suggestion as to how to actually resolve it. And since the situation has continued to stay the same for several years due to Congressional indifference, you seem to have decided to pick on IV for all the faults with EB3 backlogs and the lack of effort therein to resolve the same. For a minute, please understand that we all know the facts and realize what plagues EB3 backlogs.
2)Yes I have been on every EB3 prediction thread and know the numbers are too bad to be resolved by anything other than CIR (dead) or standalone bills. I do not know why you are stuck on insisting that we all think EB2 becoming current is the only solace for EB3 (associated spillovers etc etc.). IF Eb2 I gets current - well and good - Eb3 will still need some legislative relief (here I go again with EB2 vs EB3 - something I hate to do). But then one of your original gripes seemed to be blaming IV for not considering EB3 provisions in this Diversity Visa Bill which, at this early stage, is completely befuddling!
3) Your entire approach of going after EB2 applicants and blaming them for your dreamt up failure of IV is insane. Diluting the discussion with vitriol and then blaming everyone around you for not participating makes you a bigger "bigot" (sorry - just paraphrasing one of your used words) than what you blame others to be.
4) You do not represent my opinions. So please stop advocating yourself as an EB3 representative (which you are doing whether you believe it or not). With the points you have raised and the negative vibes you have created between EB2 vs EB3, you have shown that you are concerned and frustrated only about your own personal GC situation and are trying to use the EB3 tag to shove it down my throat. Which I completely detest.
5)I think IV should remove the EB classification that shows up with people's profiles. I do not wish to be "branded" even before joining in a discussion.
Thank you for the inputs.
1) I have read some of your earlier posts on this thread and what you have primarily done is merely re-iterated what the issue is. Without any contribution or suggestion as to how to actually resolve it. And since the situation has continued to stay the same for several years due to Congressional indifference, you seem to have decided to pick on IV for all the faults with EB3 backlogs and the lack of effort therein to resolve the same. For a minute, please understand that we all know the facts and realize what plagues EB3 backlogs.
That is because no idea we have currently works sor the situation. The only way is to think outside the box. Ok so i came up with an outside the box idea. Maybe it is a good idea maybe it is a bad idea but i did.
2)Yes I have been on every EB3 prediction thread and know the numbers are too bad to be resolved by anything other than CIR (dead) or standalone bills. I do not know why you are stuck on insisting that we all think EB2 becoming current is the only solace for EB3 (associated spillovers etc etc.). IF Eb2 I gets current - well and good - Eb3 will still need some legislative relief (here I go again with EB2 vs EB3 - something I hate to do). But then one of your original gripes seemed to be blaming IV for not considering EB3 provisions in this Diversity Visa Bill which, at this early stage, is completely befuddling!
The idea is that EB2 had benefited to a certain amount because of the change in spill over rule which is good for them i am all gung ho for them. Now since EB2 is in a postion where it will move ahead (fast or slow but it will move) IV focus will have to move towards the other category they claim to represent.
Why is doing something specific for EB3 (even with a chance of failure) NOT and option in IV. In DV bill if IV makes a stand that the 55 k visas should go to oldest priority first that is a chance to wards helping EB retrogressed applicants (Both EB3 and EB2). IV does not even need to make a stand now since it is too early. Has IV even considered it?
3) Your entire approach of going after EB2 applicants and blaming them for your dreamt up failure of IV is insane. Diluting the discussion with vitriol and then blaming everyone around you for not participating makes you a bigger "bigot" (sorry - just paraphrasing one of your used words) than what you blame others to be.
What failure are you talking about. IV is a success only problem is the success has been to a small group out of the complete EB community. What vitriol are you talking about. All that vitriol came from you guys on IV forum. I am not blaming anyone for not participating in this effort. If the idea has strength people will do that on their own. If not it will die a natural death. Please remember that my Post named (Perhaps it is time to realise a few facts.. ) initially listed the idead and the rest of my posts were spent trying to reply back to every vitriolic attach on the same post. And what did the post say. It said think outside the box
4) You do not represent my opinions. So please stop advocating yourself as an EB3 representative (which you are doing whether you believe it or not). With the points you have raised and the negative vibes you have created between EB2 vs EB3, you have shown that you are concerned and frustrated only about your own personal GC situation and are trying to use the EB3 tag to shove it down my throat. Which I completely detest.
No i do not want to represent you (An EB3). I am not even advocating myself as EB3 representative and ofcourse to the rejoinder (which you are doing whether you believe it or not) i say come on guys if according to you i am a lazy good for nothing person who never donated and never participated (My choice but i wil let it slide to make a point) to IV and never worked on anything constructive why teh hell would i want to suddenly become a representative of all EB3 (Shudder!!!!!). Will it not collide with my lazyness and selfishness.
I did not create any negetive vibes. All i said is it is time to consider piece meal (Is this not the same thing that IV advocates to lawmakers)
As far as showing something down your throat who is doing that? I stated a out of box idea and i have spent the whole day today defending it (Its a wonder how me and you all get our work done huh :P). In fact if anything i have spent the whole day removing all the comments and abuses from you guys from down MY throat
5)I think IV should remove the EB classification that shows up with people's profiles. I do not wish to be "branded" even before joining in a discussion.
I have no comments either ways because that is just changing the outer covering. The insides is still the same and it still needs some fresh approach to get out of the problem of retrogression
BTW - When i reply back to messages i do not even see the EB3 and eb2 calssification. Thsi is beacuse the messaage itself tells me what category you are. I must rephrase that... I do see the classification when i am providing advise to people becasue you do not want to gove a wrong advise to anyone right !!!
2)Yes I have been on every EB3 prediction thread and know the numbers are too bad to be resolved by anything other than CIR (dead) or standalone bills. I do not know why you are stuck on insisting that we all think EB2 becoming current is the only solace for EB3 (associated spillovers etc etc.). IF Eb2 I gets current - well and good - Eb3 will still need some legislative relief (here I go again with EB2 vs EB3 - something I hate to do). But then one of your original gripes seemed to be blaming IV for not considering EB3 provisions in this Diversity Visa Bill which, at this early stage, is completely befuddling!
3) Your entire approach of going after EB2 applicants and blaming them for your dreamt up failure of IV is insane. Diluting the discussion with vitriol and then blaming everyone around you for not participating makes you a bigger "bigot" (sorry - just paraphrasing one of your used words) than what you blame others to be.
4) You do not represent my opinions. So please stop advocating yourself as an EB3 representative (which you are doing whether you believe it or not). With the points you have raised and the negative vibes you have created between EB2 vs EB3, you have shown that you are concerned and frustrated only about your own personal GC situation and are trying to use the EB3 tag to shove it down my throat. Which I completely detest.
5)I think IV should remove the EB classification that shows up with people's profiles. I do not wish to be "branded" even before joining in a discussion.
Thank you for the inputs.
1) I have read some of your earlier posts on this thread and what you have primarily done is merely re-iterated what the issue is. Without any contribution or suggestion as to how to actually resolve it. And since the situation has continued to stay the same for several years due to Congressional indifference, you seem to have decided to pick on IV for all the faults with EB3 backlogs and the lack of effort therein to resolve the same. For a minute, please understand that we all know the facts and realize what plagues EB3 backlogs.
That is because no idea we have currently works sor the situation. The only way is to think outside the box. Ok so i came up with an outside the box idea. Maybe it is a good idea maybe it is a bad idea but i did.
2)Yes I have been on every EB3 prediction thread and know the numbers are too bad to be resolved by anything other than CIR (dead) or standalone bills. I do not know why you are stuck on insisting that we all think EB2 becoming current is the only solace for EB3 (associated spillovers etc etc.). IF Eb2 I gets current - well and good - Eb3 will still need some legislative relief (here I go again with EB2 vs EB3 - something I hate to do). But then one of your original gripes seemed to be blaming IV for not considering EB3 provisions in this Diversity Visa Bill which, at this early stage, is completely befuddling!
The idea is that EB2 had benefited to a certain amount because of the change in spill over rule which is good for them i am all gung ho for them. Now since EB2 is in a postion where it will move ahead (fast or slow but it will move) IV focus will have to move towards the other category they claim to represent.
Why is doing something specific for EB3 (even with a chance of failure) NOT and option in IV. In DV bill if IV makes a stand that the 55 k visas should go to oldest priority first that is a chance to wards helping EB retrogressed applicants (Both EB3 and EB2). IV does not even need to make a stand now since it is too early. Has IV even considered it?
3) Your entire approach of going after EB2 applicants and blaming them for your dreamt up failure of IV is insane. Diluting the discussion with vitriol and then blaming everyone around you for not participating makes you a bigger "bigot" (sorry - just paraphrasing one of your used words) than what you blame others to be.
What failure are you talking about. IV is a success only problem is the success has been to a small group out of the complete EB community. What vitriol are you talking about. All that vitriol came from you guys on IV forum. I am not blaming anyone for not participating in this effort. If the idea has strength people will do that on their own. If not it will die a natural death. Please remember that my Post named (Perhaps it is time to realise a few facts.. ) initially listed the idead and the rest of my posts were spent trying to reply back to every vitriolic attach on the same post. And what did the post say. It said think outside the box
4) You do not represent my opinions. So please stop advocating yourself as an EB3 representative (which you are doing whether you believe it or not). With the points you have raised and the negative vibes you have created between EB2 vs EB3, you have shown that you are concerned and frustrated only about your own personal GC situation and are trying to use the EB3 tag to shove it down my throat. Which I completely detest.
No i do not want to represent you (An EB3). I am not even advocating myself as EB3 representative and ofcourse to the rejoinder (which you are doing whether you believe it or not) i say come on guys if according to you i am a lazy good for nothing person who never donated and never participated (My choice but i wil let it slide to make a point) to IV and never worked on anything constructive why teh hell would i want to suddenly become a representative of all EB3 (Shudder!!!!!). Will it not collide with my lazyness and selfishness.
I did not create any negetive vibes. All i said is it is time to consider piece meal (Is this not the same thing that IV advocates to lawmakers)
As far as showing something down your throat who is doing that? I stated a out of box idea and i have spent the whole day today defending it (Its a wonder how me and you all get our work done huh :P). In fact if anything i have spent the whole day removing all the comments and abuses from you guys from down MY throat
5)I think IV should remove the EB classification that shows up with people's profiles. I do not wish to be "branded" even before joining in a discussion.
I have no comments either ways because that is just changing the outer covering. The insides is still the same and it still needs some fresh approach to get out of the problem of retrogression
BTW - When i reply back to messages i do not even see the EB3 and eb2 calssification. Thsi is beacuse the messaage itself tells me what category you are. I must rephrase that... I do see the classification when i am providing advise to people becasue you do not want to gove a wrong advise to anyone right !!!
hot quot;Madea Movies (Tyler Perry
gc28262
07-14 11:34 AM
EB3 ROW is at Jun 2004. But as per latest USCIS inventory, EB3 ROW pending 485's are around 48,000. Visa numbers available every year for EB3 is approximately 42k. If you deduct the backlogged EB3 countries (4x3000) visa numbers, the total comes down to 30k for EB3 ROW. So EB3 ROW should become current or atleast Jul 07 in another 1.5 years. If this is not going to happen, it means they are diverting the EB3 numbers to some other categories.
my 2 cents
Note : If EB3 ROW has 30k visas per year and pending EB3 ROW 485's are only 50k.. why it is still hanging in 2004. God only knows !!
I was curious too about EB3 ROW not progressing. The only explanation could be that there were lot of consular cases with older PDs. (Or USCIS chose to ignore EB3 altogether. Remember the couple of hundred EB3-I visas wasted by USCIS recently.)
my 2 cents
Note : If EB3 ROW has 30k visas per year and pending EB3 ROW 485's are only 50k.. why it is still hanging in 2004. God only knows !!
I was curious too about EB3 ROW not progressing. The only explanation could be that there were lot of consular cases with older PDs. (Or USCIS chose to ignore EB3 altogether. Remember the couple of hundred EB3-I visas wasted by USCIS recently.)
more...
house Tyler Perry has a new film
amsgc
03-29 07:44 PM
Hi,
I am wondering if someone could please clarfiy whether the beneficiary can pay the fee for the H1 B petition and the fee for the lawyer involved in filing the petition.
It will be very helpful if you could please cite an official USCIS document.
Thank you.
I am wondering if someone could please clarfiy whether the beneficiary can pay the fee for the H1 B petition and the fee for the lawyer involved in filing the petition.
It will be very helpful if you could please cite an official USCIS document.
Thank you.
tattoo I was at my local movie house
k_usa
12-14 10:55 PM
This is an excellent idea.
I have sent invitation to 2 of my friends.
I came to know about this site by looking at a post from one of the website where i visit daily (www.idlebrain.com).
Members should post immigrationvoice.org link in all the forums which they know
I have sent invitation to 2 of my friends.
I came to know about this site by looking at a post from one of the website where i visit daily (www.idlebrain.com).
Members should post immigrationvoice.org link in all the forums which they know
more...
pictures tyler perry movies.
r2i2009
04-09 11:41 PM
Guys,
What is IV step towards L1A misuse?
I am hearing that too many people are using up this category.
Hmmm....what a Pity?
Does the Gov know....I am sure not.
Cooked up Resumes, small companies are misusing this kind of Visas...
This is not acceptable. Please contact you local Senators.
What is IV step towards L1A misuse?
I am hearing that too many people are using up this category.
Hmmm....what a Pity?
Does the Gov know....I am sure not.
Cooked up Resumes, small companies are misusing this kind of Visas...
This is not acceptable. Please contact you local Senators.
dresses Tyler Perry Good news for all
amitjoey
12-13 01:39 PM
I just sent another email to friends, inviting them to Join IV. Please raise awareness amongst your friends.
more...
makeup *It#39;s here, Tyler Perry#39;s
kittu1991
04-08 03:28 PM
Hope you had a nice vacation. :p
Couldn't resist. Please follow the FOIA thread that is in red.
10,000 was collected and 2500$ advance was sent out to USCIS. Now we wait to hear back from them.
Sorry for ignorance. How is this list usefull? We will know who are the lucky ones to be greend. But how does it help?
Couldn't resist. Please follow the FOIA thread that is in red.
10,000 was collected and 2500$ advance was sent out to USCIS. Now we wait to hear back from them.
Sorry for ignorance. How is this list usefull? We will know who are the lucky ones to be greend. But how does it help?
girlfriend like all of Perry#39;s films,
starving_dog
06-19 11:31 AM
In my humble opinion, it would be damaging to IV's goals to participate or otherwise support a lawsuit that would anger the very people that they are lobbying.
I'm not saying that the idea is not without merit, it just wouldn't be appropriate for IV to participate.
I'm not saying that the idea is not without merit, it just wouldn't be appropriate for IV to participate.
hairstyles Even though Tyler Perry wrote
paskal
06-27 06:53 PM
The good thing is eliminating the country quota is always lumped with doubling the total quota and/or recapturing previous years waste, so hopefully the affect evens itself out.. Eliminating the coutry qouta by itself is a disaster.
the elimination of country quotas alone only redistributes pain...where our goal is to end everyone's pain. we asked for all the measures on our agenda and we support the whole package together. we want a better immigration system for everyone.
the elimination of country quotas alone only redistributes pain...where our goal is to end everyone's pain. we asked for all the measures on our agenda and we support the whole package together. we want a better immigration system for everyone.
buddyinsd
08-05 02:01 PM
Guys,
What do I make out of this? U think once assigned to an officer thgs shud start moving? Or...even after getting assigned to an IO thgs can go bad? Has any thing of that sort also happened? Just curious so I can be prepared...
Thanx
Just back from an Infopass appointment.
The lady was friendly and chked the status of my application. First she informed me that it was under review and then she told me that on Aug 3, it was assigned to an IO. I didn't ask any further questions as the news that my case has been assigned to an officer made me happy. I just wished her a good day and left.
Now, I'm beginning to wonder if I shud have asked more questions such as about Namecheck, FP etc...But I donno its with an IO and I guess I'll know the actual status shortly.
PD - Feb 06
What do I make out of this? U think once assigned to an officer thgs shud start moving? Or...even after getting assigned to an IO thgs can go bad? Has any thing of that sort also happened? Just curious so I can be prepared...
Thanx
Just back from an Infopass appointment.
The lady was friendly and chked the status of my application. First she informed me that it was under review and then she told me that on Aug 3, it was assigned to an IO. I didn't ask any further questions as the news that my case has been assigned to an officer made me happy. I just wished her a good day and left.
Now, I'm beginning to wonder if I shud have asked more questions such as about Namecheck, FP etc...But I donno its with an IO and I guess I'll know the actual status shortly.
PD - Feb 06
santb1975
04-16 02:35 PM
No one has asked me out for lunch today which gives me a chance to go for a run..see you all later
We are up to 24 Members now!!
The first few Welcome Packages (T Shirt included) are also being mailed out today!!
We are up to 24 Members now!!
The first few Welcome Packages (T Shirt included) are also being mailed out today!!