franklin
09-19 11:41 PM
you mean you guys stopped tracking?
I was checking in on the IV boards whilst in DC and didn't see much change in activity on the tracking threads!:cool:
I was checking in on the IV boards whilst in DC and didn't see much change in activity on the tracking threads!:cool:
wallpaper satellite map of queensland
aamchimumbai
12-09 10:42 AM
Folks,
We received letter from USCIS NSC saying that our AP (incl. my spouse) were approved on 10/15/08. On 11/17/08 we received RFE on my spouse AP application for photos. My wife had already left for India (11/15/08) assuming that our AP was approved. Anyways.
My question - If NSC approves her AP application (again), which date will she have on her approved AP application (i.e will the date be still 10/15/08 OR after the RFE response for photos). Photos were received at the NSC on 11/26/08.
Is anyone in the same situation. Your input is much appreciated.
Thanks.
We received letter from USCIS NSC saying that our AP (incl. my spouse) were approved on 10/15/08. On 11/17/08 we received RFE on my spouse AP application for photos. My wife had already left for India (11/15/08) assuming that our AP was approved. Anyways.
My question - If NSC approves her AP application (again), which date will she have on her approved AP application (i.e will the date be still 10/15/08 OR after the RFE response for photos). Photos were received at the NSC on 11/26/08.
Is anyone in the same situation. Your input is much appreciated.
Thanks.
sroyc
06-15 06:30 AM
Hi Richard,
You should check the EB3 ROW (Rest of the world) date in the visa bulletin which is published every month - Visa Bulletin (http://travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html)
The July bulletin shows the date as 15th Aug 2003. It's difficult to estimate when it'll get to July 2007 because the movement is not linear.
Hi Everyone
I am fron the UK and my PD is July 2007. I140 approved Feb 2009. Does anyone have any Idea of the length of the backlog for E3 visas for the UK.
Cheers
Richard
You should check the EB3 ROW (Rest of the world) date in the visa bulletin which is published every month - Visa Bulletin (http://travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html)
The July bulletin shows the date as 15th Aug 2003. It's difficult to estimate when it'll get to July 2007 because the movement is not linear.
Hi Everyone
I am fron the UK and my PD is July 2007. I140 approved Feb 2009. Does anyone have any Idea of the length of the backlog for E3 visas for the UK.
Cheers
Richard
2011 On new years eve, a flood had
sertasheep
05-10 08:53 PM
Dear IV Members,
Recording of the May 12 Attorney Conf. Call Recording is now available at http://immigrationvoice.blogspot.com
No immediate conf. calls are planned at this time. Please await more details.
For reference purposes: on how to submit questions for future calls, see details at http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4316
We will advise when the next call is planned so that you can time your questions accordingly
Recording of the May 12 Attorney Conf. Call Recording is now available at http://immigrationvoice.blogspot.com
No immediate conf. calls are planned at this time. Please await more details.
For reference purposes: on how to submit questions for future calls, see details at http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4316
We will advise when the next call is planned so that you can time your questions accordingly
more...
ski_dude12
07-27 03:45 PM
Tell your attorney to file a Writ of Mandamus. You can google it to get more details.
Circus123
04-04 11:21 PM
This article is very interesting. The legal immigration dropped even though the applications flooded in last year.
Check these links out!
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jVzJBVTd1tawK227QQZltW_jigzwD8VRA5JO1
Interesting data statistics:
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/LPR_FR_2007.pdf
Check these links out!
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jVzJBVTd1tawK227QQZltW_jigzwD8VRA5JO1
Interesting data statistics:
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/LPR_FR_2007.pdf
more...
siva008
03-28 08:16 PM
Hi
my GC job title is programmer analyst(15-1021.00), and curently working as a Sr.Programmer analyst using EAD with different company.
Now they are promoting me as a Applications Project Lead, most of my job dutie are same as programmer plus some additional role.
I dont know whether I can accept this promoton or not, I sent a mail to lawyer, mean while if any one of you have similar experience please advice
Thanks
my GC job title is programmer analyst(15-1021.00), and curently working as a Sr.Programmer analyst using EAD with different company.
Now they are promoting me as a Applications Project Lead, most of my job dutie are same as programmer plus some additional role.
I dont know whether I can accept this promoton or not, I sent a mail to lawyer, mean while if any one of you have similar experience please advice
Thanks
2010 Queensland Floods ~ Donations
invincibleasian
02-19 05:25 PM
Wait for an RFE. Otherwise ignore. First rule never provide any additional information than what is required.
more...
pappu
03-28 03:36 PM
Immigration Voice (IVpappu) on Twitter (http://twitter.com/IVpappu)
hair Queensland floods map
Macaca
07-29 06:03 PM
Bet on India (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/28/AR2007072800999.html) The Bush administration presses forward with a nuclear agreement -- and hopes for a strategic partnership. July 29, 2007
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
more...
vinzak
01-15 04:11 PM
There shouldn't be a problem. There's your DOB, A# and photograph on the card to verify that the person is actually you.
But I think you should still file for a correction.
But I think you should still file for a correction.
hot The Google Queensland flood
gc_dedo
04-09 12:04 PM
EB3 NSC applied 7/11/2007
LUD 3/27/2008
LUD 3/27/2008
more...
house Flood peaks in eastern
sks
12-27 01:24 AM
Hi,
I got offer for "Manager - Production Support" from my current company where I work as Tech Lead. I know there are issues with job code. I ran this through my attorney and this is her response:
"This would be considered a "material change" in your job for
immigration purposes. You can only make such changes after your green
card application has been pending for 180 days."
Is above correct? Has anybody accepted managerial position while I-485 is pending? Please advice.
Thanks.
SK
I got offer for "Manager - Production Support" from my current company where I work as Tech Lead. I know there are issues with job code. I ran this through my attorney and this is her response:
"This would be considered a "material change" in your job for
immigration purposes. You can only make such changes after your green
card application has been pending for 180 days."
Is above correct? Has anybody accepted managerial position while I-485 is pending? Please advice.
Thanks.
SK
tattoo This is the lightning map an
Blog Feeds
06-03 10:10 PM
Kudos to President Obama and his Attorney General for standing up for the Constitution.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/06/big-news-ag-holder-reverses-mukasey-right-to-counsel-decision.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/06/big-news-ag-holder-reverses-mukasey-right-to-counsel-decision.html)
more...
pictures This is the lightning map an
ashishgour
10-25 06:07 PM
Hope this bill helps us !!!:confused:
http://www.immigration-law.com/
http://www.immigration-law.com/
dresses Bligh calls flood crisis
chanduv23
03-21 08:24 PM
Join IV-NY (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/immigrationvoiceny) mailing list. Please promote this group and add more members
more...
makeup Queensland floods: floods in
Pari8
01-24 07:05 AM
I was working for company A in US till June 2008. I had to return to India in July 2008 due to personal reasons. My 6th yr on H1b expired in October 2008.
I am now in India and applying for 3yrs H1b extension based on my approved I140 with company B. My I485 was filed in august 2007. I do not have US pay stubs since July 2008 as I did not work in US.
Has anybody been in a similar situation? What are the chances of getting approval? Once I get I797 approval, should I expect further challenges in getting visa stamped in India?
thanks
-Pari
I am now in India and applying for 3yrs H1b extension based on my approved I140 with company B. My I485 was filed in august 2007. I do not have US pay stubs since July 2008 as I did not work in US.
Has anybody been in a similar situation? What are the chances of getting approval? Once I get I797 approval, should I expect further challenges in getting visa stamped in India?
thanks
-Pari
girlfriend Map indicating rising and
Blog Feeds
08-09 10:40 PM
USCIS has reminded all applicants for Adjustment of Status, Asylum, Legalization and Temporary Protected Status to obtain an Advance Parole (AP) document before traveling abroad. AP allows an applicant to re-enter the U.S. after traveling abroad.
In order to obtain Advance Parole, individuals must file Form I-131, Application for Travel Document to USCIS. The USCIS cautions individuals planning on traveling abroad to file Form I-131 well in advance of their travel plans (approximately 90 days before) in order to prevent possible conflicts.
We suggest all applicants of I-131 to file it in time to get the AP approval before leaving the U.S., otherwise it could have dire consequences and may result in an individual not being able to re-enter. Therefore, individuals that have a pending I-485 are encouraged to apply for Advance Parole before traveling abroad for easier re-entry if the circumstances of their current status changes.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/07/uscis_instruction_to_obtain_ad.html)
In order to obtain Advance Parole, individuals must file Form I-131, Application for Travel Document to USCIS. The USCIS cautions individuals planning on traveling abroad to file Form I-131 well in advance of their travel plans (approximately 90 days before) in order to prevent possible conflicts.
We suggest all applicants of I-131 to file it in time to get the AP approval before leaving the U.S., otherwise it could have dire consequences and may result in an individual not being able to re-enter. Therefore, individuals that have a pending I-485 are encouraged to apply for Advance Parole before traveling abroad for easier re-entry if the circumstances of their current status changes.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/07/uscis_instruction_to_obtain_ad.html)
hairstyles Australia Floods 2011 Photos
trueguy
03-15 02:09 PM
Admin:
Please delete this thread.
Thanks.
Please delete this thread.
Thanks.
Blog Feeds
02-05 06:40 PM
Immigration policies at today's USCIS may change in a flash. They can be announced and then, without forewarning or explanation, withdrawn in the milliseconds it takes for the agency's webmaster at www.uscis.gov to push the upload and delete buttons. At times they are as reliable and ephemeral as the inducements of a carnival barker. Take for example a January 19, 2010 policy memo, "Signatures on Applications and Petitions Filed with USCIS" (penned by USCIS Acting Deputy Director, Lauren Kielsmeier). The memo appeared evanescently and then, as Ron Ziegler, Richard Nixon's former press secretary in the Watergate era, might have said,...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/02/signature.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/02/signature.html)
paddu_es
01-31 12:29 AM
I have my H1B visa with NIIT. My petition and visa for the first 3 yr period expire in October 2008. I am returning to India in April '08 to do my MBA, and will resign from NIIT, and therefore will not be able to renew my visa.
If I want to work in the US after I graduate, say in August '09, can an employer file a transfer petition based on this visa? Or Will they have to file for a new one under the quota? And if so, is there a way that I can hang on to my H1 status?
Thanks!
If I want to work in the US after I graduate, say in August '09, can an employer file a transfer petition based on this visa? Or Will they have to file for a new one under the quota? And if so, is there a way that I can hang on to my H1 status?
Thanks!